You are not logged in.
Gildor Inglorion wrote:
Smauuuuuuuug on the waaaater
Offline
[....Plays guitar riff in his head....]
Offline
http://www.theonering.net/torwp/2014/07 … r-trailer/
Time zone dependent I believe.
Last edited by ddaines (Mon, Jul28 2014 4:51pm)
Offline
I deny all knowledge of this "Barliman's chatroom" - the man's a fraud.
Offline
OK, just wached it - the rumours of Dwarves mounted on boars weren't true - they seem to be on rams, not boars, but I have to admit they look rather impressive.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSzeFFsKEt4
Offline
It looks quite wrong to me. I've got the feeling I'm watching some crazy Dungeons & Dragons movie.
Offline
Yep, the mountain sheep / rams / goats or whatever are doubtless the worst aberration that the movies have yet inflicted on Middle-earth, but they're still better than boars. Maybe.
Hollywood rules, as they say. I guess the makers decided they needed to appeal to a different bunch of fans than with the LOTR movies (the result of The Hobbit having been considered a children's book since it was first published probably hasn't helped, since most D&D fans are kids), and they've behaved accordingly. As I've remarked several times before, I'm treating these three films as crazy D&D movies, as you say, rather than serious attempts to adhere to the detail and spirit of the book. By keeping my expectations low I'm therefore still able to enjoy them.
Offline
Who knows? You may be right. But I shan't form an opinion until I've seen the movie.
Offline
Hmm, well apparently a lot of the uhm, film work for this trilogy has been done in "post" (ooh, film jargon). In other words, things are shot and then Mr. Jackson messes with it in the editing room. People who have paid more attention than me have spotted lots of odd little incongruities arising from this approach.
Which is a long way of saying: there were probably boars there before. Now there are goats. Which are just as lame.
However, there are other aspects to the trailer which scream, to me, all the things I've loved about the Middle-earth films. I resent this. I know they are teasing me with Tolkienish wistfulness and armoured elves and so on.
Of course lots of evidence of the "tellytubbies" school of modern film making. Why do we want high resolution 3d films with 48fps? Grump grump.
Offline
Looks interesting to me.... Although I had long time since crossed the link between Tolkien's world and the modern blockbuster art ... so lets wait to see PJ final cut.... ( I hope in new movie will not be possible to see "The golden dwarf" )
Offline
Another big fight, that's all I can expect from what I see. ... What's the point looking for 3hours of fighting ?
Not many things I see brings me come back on M.E....
I hope I'm wrong and the movie will not be about only a battle.
Offline
For those who still like the look of the movies ( for example myself ) and are not able to take HD screenshots of the latest trailer,
have a carefully look here:
http://thorinoakenshield.net/battle-of- … creencaps/
Offline
Thanks for this, Master Archer. Very useful for examining the images in detail.
While the movie may have embarrassingly little to do with the book, it still looks like great fun. The Dwarf chariot is quite a device!
Offline
Clip from the extended version DVD
http://www.theonering.net/torwp/2014/08 … d-edition/
Offline
Well, I'd be more enthusiastic about this clip if it was actually from the book. Why do there have to be vines, when a boat would have done the job? The vines were thought to be more dramatic and cinematic, I guess, if sillier.
Offline
I have seen all the miniatures released by that "other" company.
And it makes me really sad.
What a missing chance.
I really made my mind up about phaeton. There should be figures released EVERY month. But it didn´t.
if I remeber right, there should be miniatures released figures of a so called "Necromancer´s Tower" range at the start of April. There is none.
( and please Gildor, don´t explain that Mr. Tubb is very busy at present . . . )
At the very first time I really come to the serious point to quit . . .
Offline
I still think that we will see the Necromancer's Tower miniatures. I just don't know when. I agree about the GW stuff. I did not buy any of it. They may release a few more pieces before the last movie.
Offline
Oh I won't say master Tubb is busy at all, he may be but that's not the reason why the Necromancer is not on sale yet. I have the reason I can tell you exactly by quoting Chris directly :
" ... As for the Phaeton range, I was a bit disappointed in the Destroyer sales and am still a long way from breaking even on this and the more recent releases before it. Analysing the first year or so sales went extremely well for the first six months and then gradually began to decline. One possibility is that the sales went well at first because of the regularity of the releases and that it was after my original stock of designs ran out and I could'nt keep up the same release schedule that sales began to fall. With this in mind I have decided to build up a stock of figures before releasing any new ones. This will enable me to release two per month again and it will show me whether the regularity does indeed impact on the sales. The Necromancer's tower has been expanded , I am completing the re-make of the Elven princess vignette .... Once I have completed 8 months worth of figures I will start to release them once more. If they continue to sell poorly even with the regular release then I will terminate the range. "
well, there you have it
Offline
Exactly. :-)
Although we don't know yet when that supply will be ready.
Last edited by twrich (Mon, Aug25 2014 1:24am)
Offline
To be honest, I am really not surprised about this development which I do not like at all.
For a very long time I've been having very pessimistic thoughts about Phaeton Design.
I wish things went better, indeed.
Gildor, thank you very much for passsing on Chris' thoughts in public.
Er, is this the right place to discuss these matters? I'm not sure.
Offline
Chris was ok to share this statement with everybody (well the part I posted) so there is no secret about it
Offline
I can only disclose what I'm told I can disclose of course... or I should say, I cannot disclose what I was told not to share...
Offline